计数型MSA 研究统计报告Attribute MSA Statistical Report% 评价人自身% Appraiser1变差来源Sourece% 评价人 Vs 基准值%Score vs Attribute2评价人1#评价人2#评价人3#评价人1#评价人2#评价人3#Appraiser AAppraiser BAppraiser CAppraiser AAppraiser BAppraiser C总检查数Total Inspected50505050505050100.0%100.0%94.2%匹配数计算值# Matched50100.0%100.0%94.2%50100.0%100.0%94.2%50100.0%100.0%94.2%50100.0%100.0%94.2%50100.0%100.0%94.2%95% UCL95% UCLCalculated Score95% LCL95% LCL错误的拒收（由于评价人偏倚造成的拒收）：误警率错误的接受（由于评价人偏倚造成的接受）：漏检率混合的（操作者接收和拒收相同的零件）系统有效性结果System% Effective Score3000000000系统有效性结果与基准值的比较System% Effective Score vs Reference450总检查数Total inspected50匹配数# in Agreement5050100.0%95% UCL95% UCL计算结果Calculated Score95% LCL95% LCL注：1) 试验中，评价人之间2) 试验中，评价人与标准之间的一3) 所有评价人本身与其他人的一致4) 所有评价人本身与其他人的一致100.0%100.0%94.2%Notes：1) Appraiser agrees with him/herself on all trials2) Appraiser agrees on all trials with the knownstandard3) All appraisers agreed within and betweenthemselves4) UCL and LCL are the upper and lower confidenceinterval bounds, respectively.100.0%94.2%分析结论Total Conclusions:#DIV/0!备注：判断标准根据以下五点DecisionmadeBased onthefollowing fivepoints作业员之间的一致性Between Appraiser#DIV/0!作业员与基准的一致性Appraiser to Refer#DIV/0!误发与漏发警报概率False Alarm& Miss Rate#DIV/0!作业员的有效性Appraiser Effectiveness一致 Good系统的有效性System Effectiveness一致 Good
